Exploring Extraverted Feeling (Fe)
Extraverted Feeling, or Fe, is one of the eight cognitive functions laid out by Carl Jung. The cognitive functions are the basic building blocks for each of the 16 personality types. It occurred to me recently, that while we (Practical Typing) have brief cognitive function overviews, we haven’t taken the time to write an in depth, high level article exploring each one. With that in mind, I’m going to launch a new series, and I’ll start by exploring extraverted feeling.
Who uses Extraverted Feeling?
Before we get into the weeds on this function, let’s focus in on who we’re talking about. Every personality type has a cognitive function stack made up of only four cognitive functions. In other words, since there are eight functions in total, only half of the 16 personality types have Fe, namely the TPs and the FJs. However, with that in mind, the TPs often devalue Fe, since it is either in the third or fourth slot of their function stack. (Their Introverted Thinking, or Ti, often overrules their Fe.) Therefore, this article primarily applies to the FJ types, which are ESFJ, ENFJ, ISFJ, and INFJ.
The FJ types will be the ones prioritizing Fe, and thus will lean on it heavily in their daily lives. They will have the greatest range of use for the function, in both the positive and negative directions, although they will be the most apt of all the types to use it in a healthy, and positive way.
The Core of Extraverted Feeling
Extraverted Feeling, or Fe, is an extraverted judging function based on feeling. Extraverted functions in typology are objective, which means externally focused. (Read more here: Objectivity vs. Subjectivity) In other words, Fe prioritizes external sources of emotion. Their primary focus is on the emotional environment in the real world.
10 Characteristics of Extraverted Feeling
Bear in mind, that some of the information below will describe core cognition, while other parts will describe common behavioral trends. You don’t have to relate to everything 100% in order to be an FJ.
1. FJs are easily influenced by the emotional environment
Naturally, what you focus on heavily will influence you the most. Since Fe types prioritize external emotions, external emotions heavily influence them. Many Fe users report adopting the feelings of those around them to the point that they lose track of their own feelings. People like to call FJs fake or inauthentic, because of this tendency. However, in reality, the emotions they are feelings are very real to them, at that moment. FJs periodically need to separate themselves from their group, in order to introspect and gain clarity on their own feelings. An inability to do so indicates underdeveloped Ti, or Introverted Thinking. An EXFJ with severely underdeveloped Ti will adapt too much to their external environment, and lose all sense of individuality and personal identity.
2. FJs have a great capacity for empathy
For the record, any type can be empathetic, or lack empathy entirely. However, since extraverted feeling is naturally attuned to the emotions of others, FJs are naturally inclined towards empathy, assuming that they’re both healthy and moral. They will absorb the emotions of another person, feel their feelings with them, and try to give them a safe place to express those feelings. FJs often need someone to help them sort through their feelings, so they may strive to fill that role for someone else. (Unhealthy FJs, on the other hand, may lack all empathy, instead becoming inauthentic and even self-serving. They may simply mirror the emotions of those around them, or actively respond to or manipulate relationships in a way that is personally advantageous.)
3. FJs may feel empty without objective sources of emotion
INFJs often see themselves as thinkers. They describe feeling cold or analytical on the inside, detached from their own emotion. This is the result of having an introverted judging function based on thinking. In other words, FJs analyze themselves or introspect with Ti. Their connection to emotion comes from the outside. Sure, everyone has personal feelings, but FJs will have a greater need to seek outside emotional stimulation. Nowadays, this can be virtual, artificial, or face-to-face.
4. FJs desire community and connection
I’m not saying that all FJs will be socially extraverted, belong to large groups, or have a wide circle of friends. However, FJs will seek out some sort of group or place to which they can belong. Some may want to take an active role in their chosen group, deeply desiring to be impactful and valuable to those around them. Others may be more passive, content to simply belong. FJs will often be extremely sensitive to rejection, fearing that they’ll become isolated, trapped as an outsider looking in. (Remember: even the most socially adept person can feel misunderstood and alone.) An inability to connect with others or find that place of belonging will produce low self-worth in FJs, due to a failure to use their Extraverted Feeling well.
5. FJs, due to extraverted feeling, need social harmony
Most people, when asked, would express a preference for social harmony. After all, being in an environment that’s flooded with negativity, in any form, is rarely fun. Feelers especially, whether Fi or Fe, tend to express a desire for harmony. However, the main distinction here is that the FJs have a greater need for it, due to their focus on external emotions. (While FPs can be affected by a negative environment, FPs have better emotional boundaries. They know what’s them, and what’s not.) FJs need harmony to protect themselves, and their emotional well-being. After all, a negative environment will bring them down very quickly, as they naturally start to adopt the emotions of the room.
Due to this aversion to negativity, FJs may struggle to address conflict at all, leading to avoidance. To the extreme, they may force the people around them to keep up a false appearance of harmony. Obviously, this would be to their detriment, since it often results in growing resentment and worse problems down the road.
6. FJs value social rules which promote harmony
Due to the previous point, FJs often fixate on rules that standardize the interpersonal behavior of those around them. A basic example of this is politeness. Rude behavior often triggers Fe users, because it threatens group harmony. Naturally, what is considered polite varies from culture to culture, but oftentimes, FJs are the one’s most compelled to follow the social rules, enforce the social rules, or both. While FJs often desire to remain on friendly terms with people, they will exile (or support the exile of) someone from the group if that person is deemed a threat to group harmony and emotional well-being.
7. FJs value unity and togetherness
In their effort to ensure group harmony, FJs will often promote a shared value system. They’ll seek to find common ground with those around them, wanting to focus on similarities and not differences. As a result, FJs may (intentionally or inadvertently) suppress the individuality or self-expression of themselves or others, in order to ensure both harmony and unity. Since they prioritize extraverted feeling, they’ll be sensitive to any behavior that might trigger those around them. A healthy and mature FJ will take individuality into account, but will still trend toward emphasizing group values.
8. FJs have a heightened awareness of group dynamics
With the desire for harmony, comes a focus on cooperation and group unity. FJs focus on the “big picture” when it comes to people. They see the group as a whole, and often feel responsible for making sure all the gears are turning as they should. This can mean enforcing/following rules, as mentioned before, or it can mean smoothing over awkward moments and doing whatever is necessary to ensure that everyone is comfortable and content. For instance, they may put themselves out there by asking the stupid question that everyone is thinking.
9. FJs are prone to getting involved in relationship conflict
Due to a focus on the ensuring the emotional needs of their community, FJs may feel compelled to help whenever they see something going wrong. This can mean simply listening, giving advice, and generally providing emotional support in any way they are capable of. It can also mean playing the role of a mediator, to help clear up the conflict and restore the relationship. In the negative, however, those with extraverted feeling may enjoy gossip, give advice where it isn’t wanted, or meddle in other people’s affairs.
10. FJs frame their behavior in terms of what’s best for others
Fe is not always selfless. In fact, Fe and Fi have an equal capacity for selfish and selfless behavior. However, since Fe is oriented to the external, FJs will often use reasoning that sounds selfless when justifying their behavior. For instance, when they cross a line, whether that be due to pushing an unwelcome opinion or perhaps meddling in someone else’s life, FJs will often say “I was just trying to help you,” or “I’m doing what’s best for everyone involved.” They may be blind to (or in denial of) their own personal motivations, whether selfish or not. (In contrast, FPs are much more willing to claim that they’re selfish, even if they’re not, due to a heightened awareness of their own personal motivations.)
In Conclusion…
The goal here was to present a well-rounded picture of Extraverted Feeling, based on the core directive of this function. While I recognize that negatives often make people feel uncomfortable, I believe that it’s important to address these for the sake of not only gaining an accurate understanding, but for personal growth as well. Of course, bear in mind, the other cognitive functions in one’s stack (and how balanced they are) can heavily influence how one’s Fe shows up. Feel free to leave a comment below or reach out via email if you have any thoughts you would like to share, as I’m always seeking to gain a deeper and more nuanced understanding of typology.
Hi there, reader! If you enjoyed that article, leave us a quick comment to encourage us to keep writing. In addition, if you've found our content helpful in some way, please consider Buying Us A Coffee to support our efforts and help keep this website running. Thank you!
Hi! People just write comments under the extroverted intuition article so I’m writing here now to thank your work (if you read comments of past articles sometimes). I really like these kind of cognitive function in-depth descriptions, I feel I can get a more complete picture in my mind of how each functions work. Keep up with the quality work!
As I see, usually intuitives, especially NFs like to create and work on typology websites. And we are good at understanding abstract ideas but often less able to express them, or maybe less able to express them on a way that not just our fellow intuitives will understand it but anyone else too. This, literally “practical” approach is why I really like your website because – unlike we, intuitives, who instinctively try to pass our overall understanding of the concept – you, sensor-thinkers really break it down to small, easily appliable pieces.
Thanks so much!
This article is great! I have to ask you a question based on this: can an Fe user hold an individualist mentality or decide a decision that’s heathly by themselves through Ti since it’s an subjective function? Maybe you’ll consider writing an Article on how Fe users gain form opinions or self-intropsect based on their lower or inferior Ti…just a suggestion
What I mean by decide by themsleves is can they make decisions base on what is best themselves (not in a selfish manner, and we all knew everyone does it) albeit in a different way than an Fi user since their function orientation is extraverted.. and that they have Ti backing them…
(only to clear up the confusion)
Yes, an FJ can definitely learn to make decisions independent of the group, for their own personal well-being. It’ll be a greater struggle for an EFJ, because their Ti is inferior, but they can learn to do it. It’ll be easier for an FJ who was taught to value individuality at a young age.
Okay, thanks!
This is really good! I really want to know what you mean that Fe users want to be seen as the “good-guy” in the Te vs Fe articles, I know they’re more than what people make them out to be but the point seems interesting. Does keeping that certain facet of themselves contradict that they frame a mentality that they do what’s best for others? You’ve also noted that Te users have a tough love mentality compare to frame what’s for the well-being (Fe)….and that Fe users can command their environment? I’m curious to hear your point on this.
And I’ve saw a few Fe users can structure their physical environment although it’s more likely a skill or a learned behaviour…
Thanks! I don’t think I understand your first question. The FJ tendency to want to be seen as the good-guy goes hand-in-hand with how they frame their actions. They’ll detached their reasoning from any kind of selfish motivations, and make themselves sound selfless and altruistic. “I did this for you,” or “I did this because it’s best for everyone.” Of course, that individual FJ could truly be selfless, or they could just be trying to (consciously or subconsciously) mask their own selfish motivations.
I try to reinforce the idea that FJs can be commanding, because they’re frequently described as doormats. Some are. Some aren’t. A confident dominant extraverted judger (Fe or Te) often has a somewhat commanding nature about them.
FJs can definitely be physically structured. Many Judgers in general prefer order over chaos, which can lead them to be more organized.
Thanks for replying! What I mean by the first question is that there might be FJs that don’t necessarily want to see themselves as a good guy if it’s what’s best for the group, or due to other factors, etc.
there might be Fe users who are structured or efficient as Te users in terms of physical environment if put much effort although like you said efficiency or structuring their physical environment will not be as much focus as organizing their emotional environment
Gotcha gotcha. Yes, I agree. An FJ may give up the good guy image to do what’s best for everyone (ie: stay true to their values).
Also I want you to expand the point on Te users having a “tough love” attitude…it makes sense that they want the group to get moving and get things done in order for the group to proceed and benefit, but I wonder what Fe would look like in a stern or smothering position?
An FJ will typically get insistent that whatever they’re telling you to do is what’s best for you. They can certainly take on a stern or “tough love” attitude like a TJ, but a TJ is more likely to live in that mode, versus an FJ shifting into it suddenly when nicer methods aren’t working.
I appreciate the clarification, because an ISFJ I know personally has anger-issues before and has an easier time living in that “tough-love” state, but she still has high Fe characteristics like interfering with certain issues, has a liking towards social manners, is very empathetic, etc.
I understand what you’re describing are trends before when you said that FJs need to be seen as a “good-guy” because I know FPs can relate to that because they want to line up with their ideals like all feelers do.
Are Fe’s chameleon tendencies are a result of their keen awareness for intrepersonal and social dymanics that they’ll mainly focus on boosting morale to their group? How does Fe take the tough love approach? What if a Fe used doesn’t see themselves as the good guy due to varying reasons like being introverted, not wanting much commotion, or they have good enough self-esteem, etc.
The chameleon tendencies are the result of devaluing individual identity, and wanting to merge with the group… to feel like they belong. This happens to varying degrees, largely based on their Ti development. A complete disconnect from Ti will result in a lack of individual identity.
I don’t know how being introverted or not wanting much commotion would change their desire to be the “good guy”. When I use that phrase, I’m not trying to say that they’ll try to be some kind of hero (although that’s possible). They’ll just want to be seen in a favorable light. The FJ might see themselves in a negative light, as a result of self-esteem issues and etc, but that shouldn’t change their desire for others to see them in a positive way. They’ll probably believe that fixing or improving their reputation will resolve their self-esteem issues.
So a warm TJ will mainly/only take a mellow approach if it’ll help keep the group moving and get things done accordingly as they too value harmony but as a way to get the group function and correspond the way they’re supposed to?
While a take-charge or stern FJ will take on a strict or severe side when it’s necessary to sway the person into convincing to know what’s good or not good for them and their well being as a whole as the drive of Fe users is to command and take control of the emotional enviroment of others?
I have observed that both can be demanding and unrelenting in different ways — but due to what you said Fe users use reasoning about what the other person may want or not want making it coming off as smothering? While Te feels the need to exert or control their physical enviroment and universal laws or systems that guarantee competence and efficiency like using and referncing policies, plans, and prodecures and operating with them to navigate external order and view things in a cause-and-effect manner? Could this the distinction you’re trying to convey between FJs and Tjs?
That sounds about right. Although, both Fe and Te can get smothering. FJs can certainly get pushy and demanding when they’ve set their sights on a solution that they believe will be beneficial.
That’s understandable! So since Fe is directed to the outer world and the subject outside of themslves that they’re likely to adapt to etiquettes and social dynamics
just as Te blends in the procedures, rational methods, etc. To guide them to the right direction?
And FJs who are promoted in positions of power are to cultivate positive feelings because of their need for external emotional stimulation? There are FJs who’ll proudly be willing to take that power to ensure the group will be following shared values.
I’ve saw FJs who think it’s best that they take the stirring wheel rather than promoting someone else in positions of leadership and power, there’s both FJs users who’ll take a mellow or gentle approach and other FJs resort to being openly commanding and direct
Yes, this is true. FJs can take either approach. The cognitive functions ultimately describe a way of thinking rather than behavior.
Thanks for clarifying! It explains why people get frequently mistyped by attributing certain characteristics to a personality type or cognitive function.
Thank you! The reason why you’re likely to think that TJs have a tough love attitude is because Te itself (separate from other functions is impersonal, focused more on things and systems than people or feelings, and to top it all of it’s probably their need to “get to the point” and direct communication style right?
Correct. Their natural focus is more on fixing a physical problem/action rather than being on the emotional component. So, they’re usually being insensitive on accident, or as a byproduct.
That makes sense! You could’ve written that FJs desire positive affirmation from their social group rather than oversimplifying in order to demonstrate a concept or general principle like adding “FJs want to be seen as the good-guy” and “FJs don’t want to be seen as the bad-guy” maybe consider adding some nuances to it to demonstrate your point next time in those older articles about Fe….
To clarify, what I mean by that question is… Fe users would rather to convince the group in leadership or positions of authority rather than just directly getting that title to merely relying to seizing that power for the sake of controlling the external or structure their physical environment out of competence (as TJs do)…?
This is a profound analysis! although I have a question for you, you mentioned that FJs have a great capacity for empathy but in the “Fi vs. Fe” article you point out that Fe itself is more prone to sympathy as for Fi they tend to be empathetic, what are you trying to convey in that description? isn’t empathy and sympathy separated from type of cognitive functions?
There’s high Fe users whom are related to who put people on a pedestal and who have tendency to over-idealize the people for who they have deep reverence or respect to and see them through rose-colored glasses, I can tell that they’re FJs because they have a need to belong, they’re fixated towards their social image towards the group, have a knack for social dynamics and bringing people together, etc.
what separates Fi idealism to Fe idealism?
*isn’t empathy or sympathy separated from type or cognitive functions? (Autocorrect)
(Anyways how do Fi users express sympathy?)
It’s also quite interesting that you emphasize in many of your articles related to Introverted Feeling that Fi is prone to idealism and revere the people they like while Fe users are the same except with a different approach — what’s your take and final say this? And why couldn’t you equally emphasize Fe idealizing someone as much as Fi? I know you say that they’re both capable of doing that in the article “Idealism: An NF tendency” but why do you often have to describe Fi as the ones who do this while users there’s less descriptions of Fe idealism — please explain
In the past, I’ve focused mainly on Fi when it comes to the subject of idealism because people like to limit it to the NF types. Whereas, I see SFPs who are prone to idealism as well, and I wanted to make that clearer since so many SFPs mistype as NFPs for reasons such as this.
Oh that explains it — so you’re trying to debunk the stereotypes about NFs only getting the moral roles? I understand that any type can be that maybe it’s just the cognition?
Ah, yes. A well-rounded description of Fe, food for the soul.. jokes aside it’s one of the more balanced and pragmatic descriptions out there… keep up the excellent work guys!
Your Type Dilemmas and Cognitive Functions Analysis articles are superb! I crave for more description like these in the future of your content — that way we can see your typing skills at full effort…
This is one of my favourite articles about Fe!
Why are FJs known for mirroring or mimicking the feelings of others? It’s interesting that you point on that they do? Any explanation?
FJs do that automatically because they absorb the emotions of the surrounding environment. Because they’re essentially feeling the feelings of those around them, they tend to express the same feelings. It can look like mirroring or mimicking, but honestly those terms are kind of reductive. I should probably double-check my wording. Lower Fe users are the ones who actually mimic or mirror, because they’re tuned in enough to track the emotional environment, but not usually enough to actually adopt the emotions in it.
Thank you so much! I was wondering because personalitycafe and the other website say “Fi mirrors emotions whereas Fe absorbs them” you in the past used the terms that they describe Fi so I wonder if Fe users are “reflecting back the feelings but it doesn’t hold the same emotional weight” back in the Fi vs Fe article.
I only need clarification why people use those terms of Fi like mirroring when they could be used for Fe
I can’t speak to why people say Fi mirrors. It makes absolutely no sense to me.
I agree, I’m even confused.. so the ones who tend to mirror or reflect emotions are lower Fe users (TPs)
There’s other website that says high Fi reflects emotions rather than absorb but honestly I can’t understand it so that’s why I’m asking for you to explain your take
And I can’t comprehend since there’s a bit of controversy, it’s really hard to simplify especially since there’s websites with different takes with Fi and Fe so that’s why I’m asking you to rationalize it into straightforward terms (only if you could of course)
I have a Fi article coming out soon that’ll delve deeper into the Fi aspect of this, but basically, both Fi and Fe are capable of absorbing emotions and being empathetic. There’s a bit of a war between feelers over which type is the better feeler, so FJs tend to explain FPs as selfish, and FPs explain FJs as fake. In reality, Fi users can struggle to absorb emotions when they don’t have a personal connection or experience with whatever is going on around them. In those situations, it’s possible that they “mirror” to avoid causing problems, but they don’t actually feel the emotions for real. Carl Jung actually describes FPs as being cold and analytical people unless they can find a personal connection, because of their subjective focus.
FJs adapt themselves to the emotional environment around them, so they will actively feel the emotions of the room in place of their own. This can lead them to be disassociated from themselves or even fake, if their personality is imbalanced and too extreme. Since the emotions aren’t theirs, but they’re temporarily taking them on as their own, it’s easy to call what they’re doing “mirroring”.
Does that help?
Later edit: I just updated point #5 of this older article to reflect this: 8 Differences Between Fi and Fe
Thanks, I’m aware that this is complicated to take in so i love your take because there’s debates between Fi and Fe
Hope you update some older articles once your knowledge or understanding of personality theory, Keep up the great content!
And it probably would’ve made more sense when the next time you differentiate Fein the previous articles you should mention that words like “reflecting”, “mirroring”, and “mimicking” are not quite the accurate words when describing how FJs operate when distinguishing them since they’re adopting the feelings of others.
https://www.personalitycafe.com/threads/fe-fi-absorbing-vs-mirroring-emotions.559082/
This is where I’m really puzzled at this point, if you could provide an explanation that would help alot (which I accept is difficult to do)