The Myers-Briggs Type of Walt Disney

Recently, we received a request to analyze Walt Disneyโs Myers-Briggs personality type. Iโve been wanting to study more real life examples, so I jumped on the opportunity, and it didnโt disappoint. To get a well-rounded picture, I watched a couple of documentaries that can be found on YouTube, and I also checked out interviews and quotes of either Walt Disney himself or those who knew him personally. Iโll share links of the relevant ones at the end of this article. Of course, as per usual, after I started to form an opinion, I checked out popular consensus, just to make sure I hadnโt missed anything obvious. Iโll be keeping all of that in mind as I proceed.
An Overview of Walt Disneyโs Personality
When people hear the name Walt Disney, they think of the entertainment empire that he built, filled with stories that kindle the imagination, that tell everyone that dreams do come true. Disney himself was known for his imagination, for being a dreamer and a visionary. However, he was more than just that. He was also a successful businessman, entrepreneur, and risk-taker. Looking closely, I essentially saw two sides to this man: the nostalgic dreamer and the demanding boss. Naturally, these create the basis for the dissenting opinions on his personality type.
The Cognitive Function Analysis of Walt Disney
The most prominent theories on Walt Disney appear to be ENFP, ENTJ, ENTP, and even ESTJ. If youโre familiar with the cognitive functions, Iโm sure youโve spotted the pattern. The argument is basically between Te dominant and Ne dominantโฆfor good reason. I spotted both the Ne and Te almost immediately. Initially, when I first started writing this article, I wanted to withhold my opinion while leading you through the evidence. However, my stance becomes abundantly clear almost immediately, so I might as well state up front that I think Walt Disney is an ENFP. So, with that said, Iโm going to start by discussing the Walt Disneyโs perceiving axis, and then his judging axis. After that, Iโll directly discuss why I believe heโs prioritizing Ne over Te.
Walt Disneyโs Perceiving Axis: Ne/Si
โWe keep moving forward, opening new doors, and doing new things, because weโre curious and curiosity keeps leading us down new paths.โ – Walt Disney
โI can never stand still. I must explore and experiment. I am never satisfied with my work. I resent the limitations of my own imagination.โ – Walt Disney
“Diversifying breaks the monotony of things.”ย – Walt Disney
“This was a man that had one foot in the past because he loved the nostalgia and used it in many motion pictures and television shows to get through to the public, and one foot in the future because he loved the technology.” – Marty Sklar
Walt Disney loved experimenting with whatever was new and interesting. (Initially, he didnโt want to get into animation at all, because he thought it wasnโt new enough.) Disneyโs work was often known for being way head of itโs time, or highly experimental (like Fantasia). He would always stay on top of any new technology or methods, and find ways to utilize them better. For instance, he re-shot Flowers and Trees (which was already halfway done) in order to incorporate Technicolorโs brand new 3-strip process. This ultimately tripled the cost, but he also got himself exclusive rights to the new Technicolor process for the next three years. Waltโs willingness to restart halfway through this project demonstrates his lack of a specific vision, and showcases a more opportunistic nature. This is more characteristic of high Ne rather than Ni. In addition, his active pursuit of the new and the novel for the sake of it points to Ne.
As stated in one of the documentaries, “many of Walt’s ideas were risky, and some saw them as ridiculous and impossible.โ His first feature length movie, Snow White, is a good example of this. People sneered at the idea that an audience would sit through a feature length cartoon, but he wrapped up all his money in the idea, risking everything on the film. One of Disneyโs employees, Joe Grant, explained, “He was great for spontaneous ideas.” Whenever Walt Disney was overseeing or checking in on a project, he was quick to produce ideas or suggestions for any issues or holes that he spotted. During meetings, he would also spontaneously act out his ideas to give people the essence of the idea. He was described as a natural actor. In addition, he was always open to new ideas or input, and encouraged others to improve upon his ideas. No one was allowed to just shoot down an idea, without producing an alternative of their own.
Of course, Si has to be coupled with Ne, and that can be seen in Walt. His daughter talked about his would โbring things from way back and reuse them again.โ In addition, she expressed a belief that in todayโs world, he still wouldnโt abandon old-fashioned drawing for computer animation. He would find way to use both. As a whole, I didnโt see an overwhelming amount of Si in Walt Disney, like I saw Ne, but these were some common themes that would come up which suggested low Si. (Although, I will be covering more Si evidence in the final section.)
Walt Disneyโs Judging Axis: Te/Fi
“…Dad had a confidence that if he liked it, a lot of people would like it.” – Walt Disneyโs daughter
โWhen I was a kid, a book I read advised young artists to be themselves. That decided it for me. I was a corny kind of guy, so I went in for corn.โ – Walt Disney
“If you live right, things happen right.” – Walt Disney
Of course, with Walt Disney, you have the classic story of an artist risking his future to his passion. The theme sounds Fi, but Iโm not going to claim that all artists are FPs. Looking more specifically at the way he was, Walt Disney leaned into his own preferences, anticipating that what he liked other people would like to. In this way, he seems more self-referencing, which indicates Fi rather than Fe. Some people would make criticisms, such as calling his work โcornyโ, but heโd either shrug it off, or in the case of his daughter, ban her from previewing the dailies in their den. Walt Disney liked what he liked, and he didnโt particularly care if other people validated it. When approaching Dick Van Dyke and the author of Mary Poppins with a proposal for the movie, he was described as being incredibly enthusiastic and excited.
However, as a boss, Walt Disney came across a bit harsher or colder. I did consider Fe due to his focus on family and building communities, but his interactions with others donโt strike like that of an FJ. Walt was outspoken about the things he didnโt like, and he wasnโt the type to flatter or even compliment. Walt would simply say โthatโll workโ when someone did a good job, produced a good idea, etc. He actively avoided giving too much validation. In addition, Walt would break up teams once the members started to like each other too much, because he believed that the best work was born out of conflict or competition. Walt could also be rather bull-headed about pursuing his goals, or doing things a certain way. When it came to Waltโs grand plans like Disneyland and Disneyworld, Harrison Price learned to always say โyesโ to his ideas, before talking about the restraints. His final project, EPCOT, showcased his Te rather well, demonstrating that Walt had a controlling, dictator-like side to him, but Iโm going to talk about that more in the next section.
Walt Disneyโs Dominant Function: Ne vs. Te
โThatโs what we storytellers do. We restore order with imagination. We instill hope again and again and again.โ – Walt Disney
“…EPCOT will always be a showcase to the world for the ingenuity and imagination of American free enterprise.” – Walt Disney
“So that’s what EPCOT is: an experimental, prototype community that will always be in a state of becoming.” – Walt Disney
Waltโs never-to-be-completed EPCOT project provides a great example for the interplay between Ne and Te. Walt was essentially designing a playground for himself, to test ideas and new technology. In EPCOT, everything would be updated with the newest technology, even down to the household appliances. His goal was to ensure that EPCOT would always be 25 years ahead of itโs time. Marc Davis said, “It was his philosophy not to build a city that would solve all the urban problems all over the world. But to give a chance to American industry to experiment, and show to the world just how the problems of traffic, and housing could be solved.” EPCOT perfectly demonstrates what I would consider dominant Ne, and inferior Si in the lack of stability such an environment would provide. Everything always changing, including the residents themselves.
Walt originally wanted permanent residents, but he was advised that residents would have to have a say in how things were run. Theyโd want to be able to vote, to hold offices, to generally participate in the local government. However, Walt didnโt want people getting in the way of his experimental society, so he decided to make all residents temporary. No more than 9 months. Of course, no one would have a say in their high-tech houses being constantly updated either. As far as Walt was concerned, he knew what was best for EPCOT and for the people in it. Ward Kimble, a long time friend, tried to warn him, saying, โYou can’t experiment with people’s lives.โ
Overall, Iโd like to sum up this section by calling out the main points I derived.
1. Walt Disneyโs ultimate goal is Ne driven, with the Te being used in service to the Ne goal.
2. The complete lack of permanence of any kind indicates inferior Si.
3. Fe is all around unlikely because when the people began to conflict with the goal, the people were essentially discarded.
In Conclusionโฆ
I hope you enjoyed reading this article as much as I enjoyed writing it. Of course, the accuracy of my conclusion is also dependent on the accuracy of the information that I found, although it all appeared to be fairly consistent, in addition to demonstrating both a positive and negative side to Walt Disney. Feel free to share your thoughts in the comments. Iโd love to hear them!
Resource Links
My Dad Walt Disney – Diane Disney Interview – DisneyAvenue.com
Interview: Working for Walt Disney
Roy E. Disney on Walt Disney’s on-screen persona and his relationship with him
60+ Best Walt Disney Quotes to Inspire You
Defunctland: Walt Disney’s City of the Future, E.P.C.O.T.
Hi there! If you enjoyed that article, leave us a quick comment to encourage us to keep writing, and check out our Updates and Current Projects. In addition, if you've found our content helpful, please consider Buying Us A Coffee to help keep this website running. Thank you!
I can’t believe I was so busy yesterday I missed this! ๐ฎ
Yeah, the ENFP conclusion makes a lot of sense, haha. I guess maybe some of the reasons I thought INFJ were kind of stereotypical. Like the โUncle Waltโ persona that he used but hated seemed sort of Fe-like to me since I thought an Fi-type would care more about authenticity but the fact that he hated putting it on might indicate Fi as well. (“That isn’t me.โ) I could explain other reasons why I initially thought he was an INFJ but then Iโll sound nitpicky which isn’t my intention since Iโm very pleased with the article, haha.
The fact that I have the same perceiving function as someone so creative who did so much is kind of inspiring! I hope we get more real-life articles of all the types. It sort of seems like seeing the cognitive functions in real life is a bit moreโฆ nuanced(?) than how they appear on fictional characters? hahaha
A new addition to the Significant figures was long overdue and this one didn’t disappoint. Amazing article!
Forgot to say this, but I think you should keep omitting putting the type of the person (fictional or not) being analyzed in the title. No spoilers.