Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.: Melinda May (ISTP)
Melinda May is typically typed as an ISTP, so this one should come as no surprise. For the record, I did legitimately consider the IXTJs (INTJ and ISTJ) and even ISFP briefly, but ultimately saw a better case for May being an ISTP. Feel free to share your thoughts in the comments. If youโre interested in reading about other characters from Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D., check out Phil Coulson, Leopold Fitz, and Grant Ward.
Ti:
โCoulson doesnโt want to tell you the truth. The truth isโฆ you have to decide why youโre here. We have a mission, and itโs not to find your parents. If you canโt put aside your personal attachments, then you shouldnโt be here.โ โ May to Skye
โIโm trying not to make it personal because May would hate that, but I canโt help it. It is.โ โ Coulson
โItโs not about sides. Itโs about the truth. Coulson left us with a mountain of lies. And the only way to understand his reasoning was inside that box.โ
โWhy is everyone making this about themselves?โ
Melinda May is known for being silent and impersonal. She sets aside her emotions and personal attachments to do her job, regardless of what that means. This makes her particularly good at making cold and calculated decisions quickly, when the moment comes. Of course, thereโs the obvious example: the situation in Bahrain. However, in that situation, May is given little choice in the matter. A less extreme, and thus more useful, example, can be seen when May, Coulson, Ward, and Skye go to pick up Hannah Hutchins, a woman who potentially has powers. May sees the situation becoming volatile. (People are threatening to turn on the woman out of fear.) So, May quickly shoots Hannah with a โNight-Nightโ gun, to resolve the situation, even though the woman had done nothing wrong. Skye looks on in horror, and scolds her later for this.
May often scolds others when they fail to set aside their emotions and their personal attachments. Early on in the show, Skye searches for her parents while working for S.H.I.E.L.D. May reprimands her for doing so, stating that if Skye couldnโt put aside her personal attachments, she shouldnโt be in S.H.I.E.L.D. Similarly, when Ward takes a bullet for May, she accuses him of allowing their personal relationship to influence his actions. (She wasnโt insulted by the prospect of him protecting her. She was just upset that he might have allowed things to get personal.)
May is loyal to her principles above any group or individual. Her reasoning for turning on Coulson during season two demonstrates this well. Up to this point, she has been incredibly loyal to Coulson, albeit not afraid to confront him directly when he makes questionable or logically inconsistent decisions. However, when she learns about all the secrets that Coulson has been keeping, May joins up with Gonzalesโ S.H.I.E.L.D., accepting a position on Gonzalesโ board. Jemma Simmons finds out and expresses shock that May would join the enemyโs side. May explains that itโs not about sides; itโs about finding the truth.
Se:
โNo. Itโs the present we need to worry about.โ
โDidnโt think. Just did.โ
โOne mission at a time.โ
โNostalgiaโs fine, but Iโd rather deal with reality.โ
May is present-oriented, focusing on the current problem and the current mission. Sheโs not one to dwell on the past or the future, which, in spite of how little she speaks, is demonstrated a few different ways. For instance, when Coulson approaches her to explain a couple of problems, she dismisses the least urgent one by saying โOne mistake at a time.โ Similarly, during the mission in Bahrain, Coulson starts talking about a future plan to assemble a team of the earthโs mightiest heroes. May redirects the focus to their current mission by saying, โOne mission at a time.โ For one last example, while in the Framework, Ophelia tells May that she needs to forget the past and focus on the future. May expresses disagreement, stating that they needed to worry about the present not the future.
May focuses on the concrete world, which is why she explains to Coulson that she usually believes what she can see. Being a woman of action, sheโs quick to respond in the moment on instinct, rather than overthink things. Of course, itโs well known that she rarely expresses herself verbally. However, when she does speak, itโs clear and concise, rather than abstract or theoretical. During Agent Koenigโs Lie Detector test, May gives short, concrete answers. For instance, for the desert island scenario, she states that a machete is in the box (a practical tool, given the scenario), and when asked the difference between an egg and a rock, she says that oneโs edible and oneโs not.
Ni:
โLook. Most of the time, I believe what I can see. You know that. ButโฆI canโt help but remember what Lumley said. Wherever Skye goesโฆโ
While May typically focuses on the present, she doesnโt ignore patterns as they unfold around her. After receiving a warning from Lady Sif about Skye being incredibly dangerous, Coulson asks if May agrees. May then recalls how what Lumley had said, how wherever Skye goes, death follows. She also lists how various events connected in such a precise way to make it seem as if Skye was fated to fulfill that ominous prophecy. (She points out that their first mission led to Skye, the map to the ancient city was encoded in Coulsonโs DNA, and they brought Skye to the city which led to her getting powers.)
May typically only says exactly what people need to know, without sharing any extra or unnecessary context, which is common for tertiary Ni users. For instance, during a mission to confiscate an important device on a train, May gets captured and tortured. However, as far as the others were concerned, sheโd merely disappeared. After escaping, May shows back up, only to say, โWheels up in five.โ After they probe for more information, she just adds, โThe train didnโt disappear. Russo sold us out. Get the plane ready. I need a shower.โ
Fe:
โBut you are defending this girl at the expense of the team.โ
โI did it for you, to protect you!โ
As an inferior feeler, May excels at sectioning off her emotions to the extent that people (like Skye) mistakenly believe that she feels nothing. As a result of her trauma in Bahran, May is almost constantly in this โemotionlessโ state. For a while, I wondered if May might be an IXTJ, because of how emotionally disconnected she is from her environment. However, at one point, Coulson describes May before her trauma in Bahrain, and he describes her as warm and even playful, in the form of pranks. As the show progress, May gradually becomes more open, and more expressive.
While she keeps herself detached from others on a personal level, May does everything she can to support the team that sheโs on. She is willing to call Coulsonโs actions and logic into question, whenever she believes that heโs not acting in the teamโs best interests. In addition, she often frames her actions or motivations in terms of others. For instance, she spies on Coulson, at Furyโs behest, but claims to do it only out of a desire to protect Coulson.
Hi there! If you enjoyed that article, leave us a quick comment to encourage us to keep writing, and check out our Updates and Current Projects. In addition, if you've found our content helpful, please consider Buying Us A Coffee to help keep this website running. Thank you!
โMay typically only says exactly what people need to know, without sharing any extra or unnecessary context, which is common for tertiary Ni users.โ
I get how NJs would give unnecessary context by focusing on the meaning than the literal thing, but how would inferior Ni users be? (I donโt have an opinion on her type, btw. Just curious behind the theory) Is there anything about this thatโs specific to tertiary Ni and doesnโt apply to the other positions?
โAs an inferior feeler, May excels at sectioning off her emotions to the extent that people (like Skye) mistakenly believe that she feels nothing. As a result of her trauma in Bahran, May is almost constantly in this โemotionlessโ state. For a while, I wondered if May might be an IXTJ, because of how emotionally disconnected she is from her environment. However, at one point, Coulson describes May before her trauma in Bahrain, and he describes her as warm and even playful, in the form of pranks. As the show progress, May gradually becomes more open, and more expressive.โ
Any reason you didnโt consider ExTJ? (Not saying sheโs one. Just curious) Was the IxTJ thing because of her temperament + the emotionless thing combined? Or is it because fictional ExTJs are usually more intense?
1. Ni + introversion typically lends itself to the lack of context, so the ISXPs and INXJs.
2. Multiple reasons. (1) May generally comes across as introverted, both socially and in the sense that sheโs very restrained. (2) She doesnโt seem to read into anything, or often chain events together into future implications. This is indicated a few times in the show. That would make me especially hesitant to suggest that sheโs an NJ. (3) I would generally characterize her as a sensor. (4) Her focus seems to be on the present, and I see no specific signs indicating that she could be high Si user. This pretty much only leaves ISXP.
I briefly considered IXTJ because of how cold she came across, never really try to mirror or express, but that ended up being mostly due to trauma.
Sounds good. Thanks!
I mentioned earlier that Iโm jealous of high Fe users somewhat, but Iโm ALSO jealous of Se-Ni users to an extent haha.
The whole perceiving process sounds soโฆ automatic. It sounds like they just take in information and then a while later they get a โEureka!โ moment and an idea of how to proceed. (My INTJ friend has described it as letting her โcookโ lol.) Almost like they have supercomputers in their head that they can just put data into and itโll spit out a plan, or a solution or an insight or what have you.
Meanwhile, over here in Ne-Si land I feel like Iโm madly rifling through a filing cabinet in my head and comparing all the data to come up with something and then I have to focus test in it 7 different global markets before I can be certain of anything lol.
Well you know, the quicker the process the more likely it is to make mistakes.
I thought the same thing with the Se/Ni users in my life lol. ๐๐ฉ Theyโre so good at putting things in order and staying on a straight path, and the way they can condense everything so perfectly instead of rambling like I do is just ๐ญ Just seems like the more raw (?) function to have. Idk. But with Se, you got Ni and Ni freaks me out, sooo. ๐ ๐
Huh. I never thought about it that way. I think I feel somewhat better about my perceiving process now, haha. Thanks, Mara!
And I never really thought about Ni as being scary before. I kind of just thought of it as your subconscious data sort of โspeakingโ to you and pointing you in a certain direction and/or influencing how you view things somewhat. I guess it could be somewhat scary if it makes you feel like thereโs some sort of inescapable fate that you canโt avoid, though.