What Does a Healthy INFP Look Like?
People say a lot of different things about the INFP personality type, some good and some bad. The reason I felt compelled to write this article is due to one very specific thing that INFPs are associated with. Namely, people often seem to think that INFPs will be chronically depressed, maladjusted, or unhealthy in some way. So, to counter that, Iโd like to address the topic of the healthy INFP. (Yes, they do exist).
Ryan actually started this series some years back with his article on What Does a Healthy ISTJ Look Like? The idea is to describe each personality type in a realistic but healthy (or balanced) way. You see, most type descriptions depict an idealized version of that type, or one riddled with stereotypes. (Our general INFP description strives to maintain a neutral outlook on the type, focusing on thought processes and standard tendencies.) So, in this article, Iโm going to specifically build the profile for a healthy, well-adapted, and successful INFP. Iโll walk through each of the INFPโs cognitive functions and explain how its use can contribute to a charismatic, healthy, and likeable individual.
The Healthy INFP
Introverted Feeling (Fi):
Fi is a judging function that focuses on subjective emotions to form a unique identity. While INFPs are often described as melancholy, healthy dominant Fi need not be. These types analyze their emotions to form a framework for judgements and decisions that will keep them perfectly in line with who they are or who they want to be. When Fi is healthy, INFPs will have their feelings and their values completely in sync, resulting in a stable, but not overly rigid, sense of identity. Theyโll know when to reassess their values or sense of self, and when to stubbornly cling to who they are and what they know to be true. They wonโt sacrifice their authenticity, but they wonโt become close-minded either.
INFPs with a healthy Fi will be confident in their decision-making, because theyโll know how to make effective decisions in line with who they want to be. They wonโt get so caught on self-analysis that theyโll be unable to act. Their minds will be fine-tuned to find what ignites passion in them, allowing them to find meaning or purpose. Even when their life situation isnโt perfect or what they imagined it would be, healthy INFPs find a way to derive purpose from what they have to work with, allowing them to emotionally commit and give it their best efforts.
Extraverted Intuition (Ne):
Ne in INFPs will take into account the parameters or boundaries created by Fi, and generate possibilities in line with that framework. When Ne is healthy, these possibilities wonโt just be pointless fantasy or paranoid worst-case scenarios. Instead, Ne will provide options that are plausible and actionable, ones that the INFP can use to either work toward a dream or further explore their sense of self. Ne will compel them to dabble, and explore, to take in new information rather than fixate on (and hyper-analyze) what they already know.
Ne will keep the INFP flexible, rather than overly fixated on a rigid sense of self based on a specific internal ideal (Fi-Si). As dominant judgers, these types might feel compelled to instantly reject certain ideas about themselves, possibilities for their lives, etc. An INFP thatโs really in touch with Ne will be willing to open their mind and reconsider, in spite of their initial feelings. Theyโll see new ways to express themselves, new ways to define themselves, new ways to fulfill their dreams and/or new ways to live their lives.
Introverted Sensing (Si):
Tertiary Si in a healthy INFP will allow them to look back on the past in an analytical way (rather than for purely sentimental or comfort-related purposes). Theyโll be able to recognize practically how certain decisions and actions impacted them or those around them. Subsequently, this will enable healthy INFPs to perceive useful patterns and learn from their mistakes (or the mistakes of others), so that they can make better and more impactful decisions.
In addition, when working seamlessly with Ne, Si will help INFPs narrow down possibilities (using their accumulated and internalized concrete experience) to only those possibilities that are realistic, and achievable. Theyโll be able to perceive which possibilities will have a desirable impact on their future. This may also help them with forming expectations that are more realistic, rather than overly idealized. In other words, healthy INFPs will be able to think practically, when they need to.
Extraverted Thinking (Te):
Healthy INFPs will not automatically view external structure or hierarchy as a threat to their identity, as is a common pitfall of low Te. Instead, they will know how to recognize when itโs time to fight the system, and when itโs time to work within it. The healthy INFP will not be against learning how to work within the established structure to achieve their ideals.
Healthy INFPs will see the value in structure. They will observe effective uses of Te, from those who have mastered the function (IE: the TJs), and implement aspects of it in their own lives. When combined with Si, this will result in consistent, daily routines that keep them progressing little-by-little towards their goals. Essentially, they learn will how to structure their lives in a way that encourages productivity. In addition, they will use Te to form actionable, step-by-step plans to reach their long term goals. (Te is basically what enables INFPs to make their dreams a reality.)
In Conclusionโฆ
My goal in this article was to present a realistic picture of how Fi, Ne, Si, and Te could all work together in the most optimal way to form a well-adapted and impactful individual. If youโre an INFP and you donโt fit the profile above, please donโt assume that Iโm accusing you of being a terrible INFP. A large majority of people do not fit the ideal description of their type, myself included. We all have areas that we can improve. If youโre interested in learning more about INFP growth, check out 5 INFP Struggles and Development Tips. Otherwise, please share any feedback you have in the comments. I look forward to hearing your thoughts!
Hi there! If you enjoyed that article, leave us a quick comment to encourage us to keep writing, and check out our Updates and Current Projects. In addition, if you've found our content helpful, please consider Buying Us A Coffee to help keep this website running. Thank you!
This is a very needed article! ๐
Does each of 16 personality types understand things differently like how Ti reinvent the wheel?
Iโm not Mara or Ryan, but itโs what you say: Each mentality understands things differently. For example, Si sees things in comparison to the past while Se sees things in comparison with the things themselves at the moment so a high Si user will be paying attention to what mistakes they could have made while a high Se user will be mostly oblivious about that and could repeat it. And the position in the stack changes the behavior of the function as well: A higher Si user will focus on the storage of useful and concrete information but a lower Si user will be more reckless, storing information without any negligible use because itโs fun. Also the development of the function and so on.
Thanks DIX_TJD ๐
And does it happen that people explain things to you in their own way amd expect you to understand? And when you donโt understand even after they re-explain it to you several times, you get labelled as an idiot.
When in reality, you have your own way of understanding things and if you do it that way, you WILL understand it.
Or there is no such thing & everyone understands similarly and you really ARE stupid if you donโt understand?
And does it happen that people tend to reject what they donโt understand? Amd despite not understanding it, they will accept it, as in putting up with something.
1. Yes. A Se user understands something better with direct experimentation while a Ni user would prefer some kind of prefiguration and so on.
2. Yes. Ti and Ni users are famous for that because they struggle very hard with giving a form to their thinking,
3. Yes. An example is the logic of Te vs. the logic of Ti: Te is focused on external data, so you need empirically reproducible and verifiable evidence to really convince those people but Ti would require to treat with the internal โframeworkโ (letโs say โset of beliefsโ) of the Ti user.
4. Youโre right but you could say that certain things could be understood similarly for different groups, for example, introverted perceivers will recognize the need for preparation, or Fe users will have an eye on emotional displays even if they have it in their inferior slot.
5. Yes, people tend to reject what they donโt understand because it doesnโt make sense at first.
6. Yes, they will do it.
I am Mara and I approve this message. lol.
Thanks for the answer ๐
Really liked this article ๐ Looking forward to seeing the other healthy, balanced types down the line.
Interesting how I related to parts of these, which makes sense considering I share the same functions and used to be in a severe grip.
Iโve been developing my Fi for the past 2 years or so, and I find that most of my assumed/ established Fi values were rooted in a:
โ fantasy version of myself, though I find most of the fantasies are the same replay, so this could be Si > Fi
โ imagined scenario (Ne > Se?)
โ habitual memory of this one thing I liked at some point in time and now Iโve internalized said thing as a pillar or skeleton of my identity (in other words, a past version of myself that I havenโt updated) (likely Si > Fi + dom Te needing closure around unstable Fi)
โ an idea (Ne + Fi> Se again?)
โฆrather than what actually is in reality at the moment.
Could this ^ be an indicator of Si/Ne + Fi/Te, or maybe Ne over Fi? Is there a reason for this that has to do with the order of the fuctions? ( Or is this just really bad self-awareness lol). Could be Si > Fi failing to update their values..? Eh?
I wonder what an SFP would think. ๐ค
Article/ blog idea: Signs that XYZ is not your inferior function. (or xyz placement). I find the not articles way more โOhhhโ than the are articles.
Thank you!
I honestly couldnโt tell you much based on this alone, but it does support Si/Ne and Fi/Te, regardless of specific placement.
I do intend to eventually write โSigns You Are NOT xyzโ at some point. (Youโve suggested series like this in the past, too.) Iโll get there eventually.
Just seeing your comment now. Thanks for the feedback! Looking forward to those articles down the line. I just saw you got a grip article thatโll be published any day now, so Iโm super excited!
Ooh, I like this new series! (Or rather, revival of an old one.) It seems like it could have a lot of potential. I hope we get an article on the Te doms at some point, since I think they have a reputation of being controlling and I was wondering what would be a balanced, healthy way to approach that aspect of Te. Having good leadership qualities without being bossy, maybe? The articleโs probably a long ways off but I canโt stop imagining what it could be, haha.
I never thought of INFPs as being sort of mopey like the stereotype describes. I always thought that since they were more in touch with their emotions they wouldnโt be as prone to not knowing how to deal with them (though, they probably donโt think of it as having to โdealโ with them? Maybe they enjoy exploring their emotions?) and being overwhelmed, etc.
Plus the fact that the (well, the one that I know of. There may be more) INFP I know doesnโt seem depressed and seems pretty well-adjusted, (Though, I just know her through a video series she and her sister posts. Not like itโs real life or anything so Iโm not sure how applicable this is.) And the INFP characters I remember off the top of my head (Luke Skywalker, the current depiction of Spider-Man) donโt seem overly dour and this stereotype is kind of alien to me, haha. I can only think of one example that might fit (Poppy from the โTangle Towerโ gameโฆ sheโs a goth) and even then she seems pretty emotionally intelligent and not really fitting the stereotype. I wonder where these stereotypes come from sometimesโฆ
I kind of just thought of them as people who were really in touch with their emotionsโฆ and moralsโฆ and self-identity and the sort of arcane (to me) way that all of those things intertwine and relate to eachother, haha.
Iโll definitely get to the EXTJs at some point.
Like youโre saying, I personally know at least a few INFPs, and they are not depressed. I think this is more of a typology specific problem, because many unhealthy people get into personality theory to use it as a self-help tool. So, a lot of type representation among personality theory enthusiasts specifically is negative.
About the depressed INFP stereotype what is actually describing is an enneagram 4, which is strongly linked in essence to the Fi Doms.