The Myers-Briggs Personality Types In a Loop, Part 1: The Extraverts
Terms like “loop” and “grip” get thrown around casually when discussing personality type theory, and this blog is no exception to that. In past articles, we have generically talked about loops, and even covered certain ones in depth. However, we would like to start giving this subject some more attention, starting with a two part series that provides a basic overview of each loop. In part one of this series, we will cover how each extraverted Myers-Briggs personality type acts in a loop. Part two, covering the introverted loops, will be published in the near future.
Prerequisite Knowledge
Discussing loops requires discussing cognitive functions, and the cognitive function stack. If you’re unfamiliar with either, you may end up a bit confused. If that happens (or if you want to run this rabbit trail preemptively), be sure to check out What are the Cognitive Functions?
So, What Is a Loop?
One’s cognitive function stack is ordered in such a way that the attitude of each cognitive function alternates going down the function stack. In other words, if your dominant (or first) function is introverted, your auxiliary (or second) will be extraverted, and then your tertiary (or third) will return to being introverted. People argue about the validity and/or necessity of the function stack being that way, but practically speaking, having it that way depicts balance. Too much introversion is a bad thing, just like too much extraversion. We all need both.
So, with that being said, a loop is an imbalanced state in which an individual fixates on their tertiary function, and “loops” between it and their dominant function at the expense of their auxiliary function. In other words, the second function is being under-utilized, because the person is primarily utilizing their first and third functions. To be clear, a loop is an imbalanced state, which means that it’s an unhealthy state. You can exist in a loop for a substantial amount of time, but it will prevent you from being the best version of yourself. (For more information, check out Can a Loop Be Healthy?)
For the record, we want to clarify that the Myers-Briggs theory doesn’t actually define whether the tertiary function is introverted or extraverted, so the premise of a loop doesn’t exist within MBTI. In other words, we don’t think loops are actually a part of the Myers-Briggs theory/MBTI. If you have an official source that states otherwise, let me know. However, we at Practical Typing subscribe to the Grant Model, and see loop theory as a useful tool that describes common tendencies within the 16 personality types.
What Causes Loops?
As stated above, in a loop, one’s auxiliary function is being avoided, or skipped over. This can happen for a couple of different reasons: (1) underdevelopment, or (2) stress/failure.
1. Sometimes, people have easier access to the cognitive functions that share the same attitude as their dominant function. In other words, an introvert might have an easier time using their tertiary function because it is also introverted. Typically, teenagers lean heavily on their first two functions, and don’t begin to develop their tertiary function until adulthood (around early 20s). However, in some instances, a teenager may develop their tertiary instead of their auxiliary, resulting in the need to develop their (underdeveloped) auxiliary function later on.
2. Stress is typically tied to grip states, but it can also cause loops. Looping can actually be a precursor to gripping, or even go hand-in-hand. So, if while in a state of stress, the auxiliary function fails to do its job well, the individual may lose faith in that function and choose to fall back on their tertiary instead, ultimately triggering a loop.
How Each Extraverted Myers-Briggs Personality Type Acts In a Loop
Now, with all that information out of the way, we’re going to give a brief overview of what each extraverted loop looks like, but with a cognitive function first approach in mind. In other words, we’re going to be grouping the overviews together by tertiary function or fixation, since the symptoms of a loop will be similar between those who share the same tertiary function. As mentioned earlier, we intend to cover individual types more in depth in future articles.
Tertiary Se Loops: ENTJ (Te-Se) and ENFJ (Fe-Se)
In this loop, the ENTJ and ENFJ skip over auxiliary Ni, and fixate on Se instead. Fixating on Se causes these types to look for immediate, short term solutions at the expense of the future. This can take the form of immediate gratification, indulging in whatever they want whenever they want, or just impulsively reacting to a situation without taking time to evaluate the long term implications. Either way, they fixate on the present and are unable to look far beyond it.
For the ENTJ, this loop may involve reacting impulsively to assert control over a situation, or prove that no one else can control them. This can lead to situations where they do something rash in order to prove a point in the short term at the expense of their long term security. For instance, they may take an extreme action like quitting a good job because they didn’t want to do something their boss told them to do. Yes, in that immediate moment they proved that they can’t be controlled, but they lost a good job over something petty. ENTJs in a loop may react angrily if unable to get the response that they want, which may prompt further impulsive action. They are more likely to make enemies, and ruffle feathers.
For the ENFJ, this loop may make them overeager to solve any perceived relationship problems, or react to any potential threats to their community/loved ones. ENFJs in a loop may also find themselves needing an excess amount of interaction with their community, in addition to constant excitement. They will have more of compulsion to push people together and push people to interact, trying to force relationships to happen now, instead of slowly building stronger relationships over time. This may lead to shallow superficial relationships instead of strong deep ones.
Related Article: ENTJ vs. ESFP: Differentiating Their Loops
Tertiary Ne Loops: ESTJ (Te-Ne) and ESFJ (Fe-Ne)
In this loop, the ESTJ and ESFJ skip over auxiliary Si, and fixate on Ne instead. Fixating on Ne
For the ESTJ, this loop will typically cause them to grasp at ideas to accomplish a specific goal, or grasp at ideas for a new goal. ESTJs in a loop will struggle to commit to one particular path for any significant length of time. It will seem as if they are cosntantly “one upping” a good idea with something better. They will be never satisfied with a current path, always veering to a ‘better’ alternative. What they gain in flexibility is lost in lack of stability. It will be difficult for them to get behind someone’s idea, and they will tend to look like a rogue element, changing things whenever they think they see a better path. In leadership, this makes them difficult to please or follow as directives may change too frequently. They may criticise their subordinates for failing to keep up.
For the ESFJ, this loop will have a relationship focus. For instance, ESFJs in a loop
Tertiary Te Loops: ESFP (Se-Te) and ENFP (Ne-Te)
In this loop, ESFPs and ENFPs skip over their auxiliary Fi, and fixate on Te instead. Fixating on Te results in an EXFP that is fixated on control. Ordinarily, ESFPs and ENFPs are easygoing, but in a loop, they become demanding and aggressive, as they attempt to exert control over their environment. This might surface as a sudden desire to optimize their surrounding, or perhaps as a need to force a certain opinion onto others. They may tunnel vision on cold, hard facts, at the expensive of their ideals. Oftentimes in this loop, these types will constantly look like they’re trying to accomplish something, whilst never actually getting anything substantial done.
For the ESFP, this loop usually causes them to fixate on their immediate environment. ESFPs in a loop may suddenly feel the need to rearrange (ie: “optimize”) everything around them, or micromanage everyone in their proximity. This is frequently to the detriment or distraction of what actually needs to be accomplished. For instance, it may lead to situations like ignoring a quarterly earnings report deadline in favor of restructuring the seating arrangements in the office to optimize productivity. Now, everyone in the office is unable to work due to their work spaces being shuffled around.
For the ENFP, this loop usually causes them to become unusually argumentative or combative. ENFPs in a loop will try to convince others of certain ideas, or feel the need to change things around them out of boredom (or for the sake of novelty). They have a tendency to get overly stubborn on principle, picking apart another opinion simply on principle. They may get stuck in a “my way is the only way” train of thought. In addition, they may try to use their ability to outlast others in an argument as proof that their idea is better instead of letting the merit of an idea speak for itself.
Tertiary Fe Loops: ESTP (Se-Fe) and ENTP (Ne-Fe)
In this loop, ESTPs and ENTPs skip over their auxiliary Ti, and fixate on Fe instead. Fixating on Fe results in an excessive need to garner attention and validation. Looping EXTPs will seek out recognition from others, relying on that for their self-confidence or to validate their thoughts and ideas. As a a result, they often become excessively image-focused. They may resort to extreme, reckless measures to gain attention, or become manipulative. In debates, they may rely on overwhelming their opponent with rapid responses, resulting in arguments that make sense on the surface, but are actually fraught with logical fallacies. In addition, looping EXTPs will be overly sensitive to criticism, which can lead to relinquishing their own valid, logical conclusions for the sake of people’s emotions.
For the ESTP, this loop will usually focus on physical acts. ESTPs in a loop may try to impress others with extreme, physical acts, due to an obsessive need to perform. Or, they may be constantly on the go, moving from task to task, never slowing down, in an effort to illicit a specific response. This loop can lend itself to a compulsion to play other people, turning everything into a popularity contest or form of tribalism. They will be quick to try and turn group sentiment against those they don’t like, using whatever status they have within the group as leverage.
For the ENTP, this loop will create a heightened need for others to validate their ideas or ingenuity. ENTPs in a loop may feel the need to constantly produce grandiose ideas or solve people’s problems in extravagant ways. Either instance may provoke ENTPs to reckless behavior to prove their value. They may fall into a cycle of sowing distrust among other people through use of rumors or twisting of facts in order to undermine other people’s positions within the group or to bolster their own. They will be inclined to use wit and making of fun of others to shape group sentiment.
Hi there! If you enjoyed that article, leave us a quick comment to encourage us to keep writing, and check out our Updates and Current Projects. In addition, if you've found our content helpful, please consider Buying Us A Coffee to help keep this website running. Thank you!
For the ENFP loop, could it not also manifest as one being really indecisive when it comes to making a decision? I know ENFPs are normally indecisive, but say for example that someone wants to decide if they want to do basketball, so they start researching all about basketball, asking people around, etc. instead of being in touch with Fi and deciding for themselves if they actually want to do basketball or if it’s just an external measure?
That wouldn’t be a loop. It just sounds like an ENFP who’s stuck in their perceiving functions… out of touch with the judging functions in general.
Hello, thank you for your hard work! I’ve been binge reading site I discovered your website (last week).
1. When you say “You can exist in a loop for a substantial amount of time”, do you mean days or years?
2. “However, in some instances, a teenager may develop their tertiary instead of their auxiliary”. Can a child (under 12) develop their tertiary?
3. Not related to this subject, but I saw an article about Ti vs Ni and was wondering if a similar article could be made about Ti vs Si. I feel like their “areas of expertise” overlap a bit in my mind and I can’t determine which one I use the most. (I should probably wait for the introverts loop article, but I can’t stop thinking about it.)
I’m not a native English speaker, so some of my wording might be a little off. Sorry about that.
Thank you! Answers below.
1. A loop can potentially last for days or years.
2. All four functions are present in children, but they’re unlikely to be able to consciously use a lower function like that. And honestly, one can’t reliably identify the personality type of a child under the age of 12.
3. I’ll add it to my list
Thank you very much!