ENFP/ENTP/ESFP/ESTP: Inferior Si vs Inferior Ni
Exploring the inferior functions, like inferior Si vs inferior Ni is a great way to approach discovering your own type, if looking at the dominant and auxiliary functions is failing you. I have seen so many people question if they are a Ne dominant (ENFP/ENTP) or a Se dominant (ESFP/ESTP). We have written an article directly on that subject, called EXFP/EXTP: Am I an Ne dom or an Se dom? which you can read if you’re interested. However, if you’re still stuck, it’s definitely worth exploring inferior Si vs inferior Ni.
This article is part of a series. If you wish to read the previous article in this series, check out INTJ/INFJ/ISTJ/ISFJ: Inferior Se vs Inferior Ne and INFP/ISFP/INTP/ISTP: Inferior Te vs Inferior Fe.
What is an Inferior Function?
The inferior function is the fourth function, or last, function in a personality type’s cognitive function stack. Each type’s inferior function is their greatest weakness, and the way in which they respond to severe stress. People can learn to use their inferior function in a positive way, but by default, at least initially, it will show up negatively. Although, to be clear, a dominant Si user (ISTJ or ISFJ) can use Si in the same negative way as an inferior Si user (ENFP or ENTP). The difference is that an ISXJ should have a greater capacity to use the function well, in addition to using it more consistently and more often. Remember, function placement measures range of use. An individual who is immature or generally unhealthy (in an emotional or mental sense) may manifest primarily negative uses of their dominant function, because they themselves are in a negative state overall. You can be in a negative state without being in a grip.
Inferior Si vs Inferior Ni: Cognitive Function Prerequisites
For those new to the cognitive functions, I am going to start out by listing the cognitive function stacks of the personality types in question below, so you can quickly reference which function goes with which type, if necessary.
ENFP: Ne-Fi-Te-Si
ENTP: Ne-Ti-Fe-Si
ESFP: Se-Fi-Te-Ni
ESTP: Se-Ti-Fe-Ni
As you can see, ENFPs and ENTPs (or the Ne dominants) have inferior Si, while the ESFPs and ESTPs (or Se dominants) have inferior Ni.
Inferior Si vs Inferior Ni: Comparing the Functions
In the following sections, we’re going to first give brief overviews of how Si and Ni look when used well. From there, we’ll rationalize how each function would show up in the negative, based on what it does in the positive.
Introverted Sensing (Si) in the Positive
High Si users, or SJs, form subjective impressions of reality based on their personal, concrete experience. They compare reality to their current storehouse of subjective impressions, for better or for worse. They are known for being detail-oriented and meticulous, because they have a very specific internal image of the way things should be. These personality types are often cautious, observant, and calculated, as a result. Obviously, this is all to varying degrees based on Si’s exact position in their function stack. However, the dominants are usually very careful and consistent people.
SJs are creatures of habit, that do everything in such a way as to minimize mistakes and ensure a perfect and predictable outcome. Therefore, they typically develop regular routines that allow them to maintain that consistency of outcome. Si dominants are also frequently good at recalling detailed information for whatever subjects or topics that they deemed useful or relevant. They can usually look back on events of significance and recall a vast amount of details surrounding what happened, which they use as a form of pattern recognition to predict future outcomes.
Introverted Sensing (Si) in the Negative
Now, let’s talk about ENXPs with their inferior Si. Inferior function use tends to be extreme or uncontrolled. Obviously, this can change with practice and time, but typically bad inferior function use should be identifiable for a decent portion of their earlier or young adult life. So, let’s take the description of good Si and flip it on it’s head.
If good Si users are developing regular routines and patterns as a way of life, bad Si users are choosing hyper specific things to routinize in their life, things that many people may deem laughable or insignificant. For instance, ENXPs may organize their desk a certain way down to the smallest detail, yet be perfectly content to let the rest of their room or house fall into chaos. Perhaps, they hyper routinize a specific non-critical task, like roasting coffee or preparing their morning eggs. This detail-oriented nature may surface in the way they talk endlessly about all the specific information regarding their routines or subjects of interest to anyone willing to listen.
Another facet of inferior Si users will be latching onto a single insignificant past detail and using it to draw an extreme or paranoid conclusion. I saw a brilliant example of this in the show Teen Wolf, where the ENFP urges his friend to get rid of her small dog because the first victim (in what they knew would be a series of victims) had a small dog. Were there enough victims to make that detail into a pattern? No. Was there any logical reason to connect small dogs to the incident? No. However, just in case, ENFP wanted her to get rid of her small dog.
Bad Si can also take on an anti-Si attitude, which can surface in openly defying traditions, past lessons, or the importance of paying attention to details. This will be more overt and purposeful than, for instance, simply ignoring traditions or fighting against perceived attempts to force them to comply with one – something which many other personality types might do. In the case of devaluing attention to detail, it’ll make them overly prone to error and miscalculation in the midst of action.
Introverted Intuition (Ni) in the Positive
High Ni users, or NJs, store away impressions, like SJs, but less personalized and specific. While all introverted functions are abstract, it may be more understandable to specifically refer to NJ patterns as abstract, detached impressions of events. They condense details down into a template or structure, in which the details become less relevant to the picture overall. (See Si vs. Ni: Details and Patterns) They compare these templates or patterns to reality, using them to predict future outcomes. (They can see multiple perspectives, but unlike high Ne users, they don’t typically struggle with ruling out possible outcomes.)
Due to the less specific nature of their patterns, NJs excel at looking at a situation and drawing conclusions based on vague information. They have a tendency to read between the lines, rather than just sticking with the face value information. They don’t typically get caught up on individual details, since their focus is on the “big picture”, or the overaching pattern. However, NJs can’t always trace back their conclusions to the specific information or sources that led to them.
Dominant Ni users specifically are also cautious and careful individuals, preferring their life to be controlled and predictable. They prefer to plan and prepare, like any other Pi (introverted perceiving) dominant. They, like other Pi dominants, prefer to have a long term goal or plan, but the path forward should be somewhat malleable. However, they can get meticulous about matters affecting their long term vision or goals.
Introverted Intuition (Ni) in the Negative
Now, let’s talk about the ESXPs with inferior Ni. As stated earlier, inferior function use tends to be extreme or uncontrolled. So, if good Ni reads into a situation and jumps to a conclusion as to how it might play out, bad Ni is going to do a couple of things.
First, ESXPs might fail to give enough consideration to varying perspectives and jump too quickly to conclusions, making them extremely prone to error. (They may not be aware of this though, if the person on the receiving end of the bad predictions never contradicts them. I’ve been on the other end of an ESFP’s conclusions in this type of scenario, and I usually just move on without saying much.)
Second, Ni used badly may make the user paranoid. If Ni is naturally seeing ways in which something may play out, bad Ni might only see negative ways in which something might play out. It’ll be similar to bad Ne (since inferior intuition in general has some shared tendencies), but the conclusions will likely be more linear (this, then this, then that). They won’t surface like a scatterplot of possible negative outcomes. Inferior Ni is more likely to produce a chain of events leading to a single outcome, or different ways the same event will lead to the same negative outcome. (Good Si can do something similar, but the “linear” conclusion will be based on a past, explainable, concrete experience. Ni’s pattern recognition is more flexible, allowing the user to produce conclusions that are either not consciously based on past experience or are a Frankenstein of their varous stored patterns.)
Introverted perceiving functions (Ni and Si) are the future-oriented functions, due to their tendency to perceive future implications in an effort to be prepared. Someone with inferior Ni might choose to completely ignore this function, resulting in a complete disregard for the future and for planning. They’ll refuse to look beyond now, choosing to live only in the present moment. Similarly, they may choose to completely ignore potential underlying information, going only with what is provable and readily observable.
Note: inferior Ni is stereotypically known for impulsively leaping into situations, completely unprepared. This behavior has been almost exclusively attributed to Se dominants, and that is a mistake. Both types of extraverted perceiving dominants are prone to leaping into situations without giving it enough prior thought due to the nature of the extraverted perceiving functions. This is not a behavior that is limited to Se dominants, and it certainly does not exclude the Ne dominants.
Inferior Si vs Inferior Ni: In conclusion…
I’m going to try to actually complete this series, by comparing inferior Ti and inferior Fi next. However, if there are two different types you’d like see compared in this way, just let me know. By default, I was sticking to parallel types that are commonly confused.
I hope you found this article helpful. Comment below with your thoughts!
Hi there, reader! If you enjoyed that article, leave us a quick comment to encourage us to keep writing. In addition, if you've found our content helpful in some way, please consider Buying Us A Coffee to support our efforts and help keep this website running. Thank you!
It’s a very good article that even went to the trouble of specifying how Ni and Si are exactly the same, but with a different approach (this has been hinted before, but this is the first time I’ve seen it so straight to the point in the website). The comments from the previous article (Inferior Te vs Inferior Faith) are right: You, Mara and Ryan, are improving your ability to make “typing” more “practical” 🤭.
I’m so glad you’ve made a deeper analysis, I’ve always been yearning for you to make articles to explore more in depth about MBTI, this helps EXXPs figure out which type they are incase if they’re in some sort dilemma… Hope you have a lovely week~
This is a gem! It’s interesting to see how personality is describe from someone with a very different perspective so I came here to thank you for this website and how much it draws away stereotypes, biases, extremes, etc. I find that oddly refreshing for some reason which I love. It’s one of the few resources online that has an overall well-written and chock full of in depth insights about MBTI and I’m growing admiration for your works… So please keep writing.. you have a part to play in Typology so keep fulfilling your role in making personality simple yet fleshed-out..
I really needed this! I had a hard time figuring out my type, but this post really changes things! Thanks to your posts I found out that I’m a (cognitive) introvert
I agree everything on what Althea said — we all encourage both of you Mara and Ryan to continue making personality theory more refined and broad with it’s information as you’re always doing your best in publishing these articles..
As an XXFP I’m stuck in a rut between discovering my true personality type — according to your articles it would seem as if I’m an INFP which makes total sense! I’m honestly stunned by how much hard-work you pull into your MBTI theory articles especially this one.
This has become one of my only 2 favourite websites when it comes to communicating information about the cognitive functions theory in a well-elaborated, captivating, straightforward ways!
I’m so pleased that you clarify the information in the “inferior function vs another inferior function” series that you’ve never done before in all your previous articles going back through those years — and now these are the few recent times you’ve opened my eyes… the positive feedback in this current “inferior Ni vs inferior Si” article are dead-on accurate and true — you’ll never cease to impress me with all your personality theory and cognitive functions analysis articles! And I’ll forever always look forward to more new articles proud of how far you’ve come and how much you grown in the past 4 years…
I’m so delighted you made this article! I gotta say I’m loving it so far. It’s great that your readers’ encouragement is nourishing your website as your MBTI and cognitive functions knowledge take on a whole next level than ever…
I especially like how you try to make your writings as clear yet discernable as possible… so we’ll always remember all the wonderful things you’ve done as a tribute to Practical Typing…
I love how accurate and fleshed out your cognitive functions and personality theory articles are it’s one of the best things about your website along with it’s eye-opening quality that can’t be ignored, I’ve learn so much from you… this’ll always be my favourite website..
Your fictional character typings are not bad at all — even though some may disagree with your opinions based on the characters’ MBTI… it doesn’t make you awful at typing characters, characters are often complex or not so..
Hmm.
With inferior Ni, if an ESxP explains their doom sequence, how would the explanation sound different with ESFPs and ESTPs from an outsider’s point of view?
Because it seems like the Ni’s absolute tunnel vision + Ti generally sounding uncertain would contradict each other. So would ESTPs be absolutely convinced of the thing that’ll happen (Ni) but sound less certain than they actually are (because of Ti)? Or do they generally keep their Ni conclusion to themselves compared to ESFPs?
Thanks!
Ping 👌
TPs don’t *always* sound uncertain. They can sound certain when they’ve fully settled on something. But either way, ESXPs are unlikely to explain their “doom sequence” to others. Most people prefer to keep their inferior function insecurities to themselves.
Gotcha. Makes sense, thanks!