MCU: Erik Killmonger (ESFP)
Se:
โBro, why ainโt you just shoot him right here? โ
โI donโt worry about no brand. Check these out. Each one is for a kill.โ
โWeeks? I donโt need weeks. The whole country ainโt gotta be here. I just need him. And somebody to get me outta these chains.โ
Erik Killmonger appears to be good at improvising and acting in the moment. He appears to prefer action over having a complex plan, and takes steps as needed to ensure his goal is obtained in the end. After stealing Klaue out from under TโChalla, Erik boldly enters Wakanda with the dead body as his entry ticket. He doesnโt even bother to change clothes to potentially hide that he is the one who had stolen Klaue out from under the Black Panther. This is a risky move as there is no guarantee that he would be received well by the people of Wakanda. For instance, he could have ended up straight in jail, never even being allowed to speak to King TโChalla face to face. Furthermore, TโChalla (had he been less honorable) could have easily refused to accept his challenge.
Granted, the movie, Black Panther, is a bit ambiguous as to what information Eric actually had been able to obtain from the book that his father had owned. However, throughout the movie, his plans as a whole, give off the appearance of not being well thought out. He intends to arm people all over the world, which would more than likely lead to mass anarchy with no guarantee that they would later fall in line under him. Weโre specifically calling all of this out due to the theory that Erik is an ENTJ. A Te dominant would ultimately want to not only obtain control, but maintain it in the long run as well. The more chaotic and spontaneous nature of Erikโs plans run contrary to this, even though he does have a long term goal that he has been successfully working toward. (Although as alluded to earlier, luck plays a huge factor in his success).
As for other potential Se evidence, during his initial debut in the movie, Erik goes in ahead of the rest of the team and speaks to the museum curator up until she collapses from her poisoned coffee. This could suggest the more hands-on approach that Se users tend to take, wanting to be in the middle of the action as itโs happening. Heโs also shown questioning why Klaue pretended to let someone go and then shot the man while he was running away instead of shooting him right away. This could point to Erik possessing an Se dominantโs natural tendency of wanting to act immediately. He also institutes radical change the moment he gains control of Wakanda, which suggests a high extraverted perceiver (Se, in his case).
Fi:
โThe world took everything away from me. Everything that I loved. But Iโmma make sure weโre even.โ
โIโm standing in your house, serving justice to a man who stole your vibranium and murdered your people.โ
Erikโs Fi is probably one of his most obvious functions, because he spends the entire movie vocalizing his Fi values, since they are the driving force behind his actions. Erik is angry at the injustice done to him as a child. He also feels anger toward injustices done to others who suffered similarly to him all around the world. Relating to others in this way points to Fi. He lectures others on the wrongs that have been done to him, using them as a justification for his actions. This is shown during his brief interaction with the museum curator, and when heโs first placed in front of TโChalla and the Wakandan leaders. He tries to make them feel guilty for their comfortable state of life when they should be doing more for those who are less fortunate. These are all obvious displays of Fiโs tendency toward activism and vocalizing their inner ideals.
Erik also attempts to gain sympathy for his actions, and desires for others to feel what he has felt. When he first faces the Wakandan leaders, in addition to preaching his ideals, he brings up his personal story of finding his father dead with panther claws in his chest. He then proceeds to proclaim that TโChalla is the son of a murderer, not a king. Also, once beaten by TโChalla and dying, he attempts to connect with TโChalla more emotionally by explaining that his father was going to show him Wakanda one day, and that he had been told that it was the most beautiful place in the world. He later refuses to allow TโChalla to heal him on principle (Fi) and because he doesnโt want his freedom taken away (Se).
Of course, it may be worth pointing out that Erik allows his selfish Fi motivation for revenge to ultimately cloud and eclipse his Fi morals. In the end, his Fi ideals appear to have been a cover or justification for his desire for revenge, but this does not change the fact that he is a high Fi user, since another type would be less likely to feel the need to justify their actions with Fi in that way.
Te:
โI want the throne.โ
Erik is a very determined individual, who spends his entire life working toward one goal. This obviously takes a lot of discipline. His speech is very direct and straightforward, especially when heโs making demands. He has no problem issuing orders to the Wakandans from the moment he arrives. He gets excessively angry when not obeyed immediately. When someone questions his desire to destroy the Heart-Shaped Herb, he instantly grabs her by the throat and begins choking her. This action demonstrates both Se and Te. (Se impulse/physical action, Te demanding/taking control). His desire as a whole for both action and destruction appears to be the result of a Se-Te combination.
Erik also falls prey to his tertiary Te desire to accomplish his goal, and allows it to eclipse his Fi morals, as mentioned in the Fi section. During his fight with TโChalla, he is shown listing off his accomplishments and actions up to that point, which tends to be a way Te users measure themselvesโฆ by external accomplishments. Among these accomplishments are things that he should have been morally adverse to. When he claims to have used his enemiesโ methods against them, TโChalla points out that Erik had become them.
Ni:
โI lived my entire life waiting for this moment.โ
As per usual, oneโs inferior function goes hand in hand with their dominant function. Erikโs inferior Ni is shown forth in his lack of a complex, or well-thought out plan. High Ni is more cautious, gathering information prior to action. Inferior Ni throws caution to the wind, and launches into action, sometimes before itโs ready, failing to give adequate thought to the future. Erik is shown displaying this tendency. While he did manage to take over as King of Wakanda, his leadership is ultimately extremely short-lived. He is shown making more impulse style decisions, and dealing with things immediately as they come. He destroys all of the Heart-Shaped Herbs, ensuring that he would be the last Black Panther. Of course, this means he was giving no thought to an heir, or perhaps needing the plant sometime down the line.
Lastly, there were a couple of ways in which Ni showed up in his personality in a more generic fashion. First, he proclaims that Black Panther is supposed to lead Wakanda into the future. Second, when TโChalla says that his primary concern is his own people, Erik tries to overly generalize by claiming that all people are TโChallaโs people since all their ancestors originally came from the African continent.
Hi there! If you enjoyed that article, leave us a quick comment to encourage us to keep writing, and check out our Updates and Current Projects. In addition, if you've found our content helpful, please consider Buying Us A Coffee to help keep this website running. Thank you!
Fantastic article as always!
Yeah Erik is considered an ESFP by the majority of people who type him and it is by and large the typing that makes the most sense for him. I find him very interesting because a lost of time ESFPs will be given more heroic roles in media (especially in anime). So having someone of the type fill out the role of antagonist is very unusual and quite fascinating to see.
I have a question regarding the Fi section of the article:
You state that Erikโs Fi leads to him using the wrongs against him as justification for his actions and while I do not dispute that I was wondering how it differs from how an Si user (especially lower Si as seen in the xNxPs) might use their past experiences as a justification for their actions.
For example is it possible for one of the xNTPs who do not possess Fi but do possess Ti and Si to use past trauma/injustices as a justification for a particular worldview or course of action? I know Si users have a tendency to deeply internalize past hurt but I imagine that any unhealthy mindset that may arise from such hurt would manifest very differently in a high Ti user vs a high Fi user. So how exactly would high Fi and high Ti differ in that regard?
Also this may be a tall order but if you could provide some examples to illustrate the difference I would be really thankful. ๐
P.S: Can we expect the 7 deadly sins characters next week? If so, will you guys be leading with Meliodas?
Thank you!
So, any type can use the past as a justification for their actions. Si users tend to be more specific about it. Theyโll crutch on certain details, determined that the repeat of those details will bring about a repeat of the past. These past details will merely serve to inform the judging functions, which will then make a decision based on the information. What Erik does specifically is generalize his past hurt onto the rest of the world (Ni). The focus of the Fi section is more that he essentially preaches personal values at other characters in the shows, justifying his actions as good and moral in spite of the fact that they are not.
Si users donโt actually internalize past hurt. (We once did explain it that way on this site, but have since tried to fix all of the instances.) Si users internalize sensory data. Value placed on that data is done so by the judging functions, so vividly internalizing past hurt is actually an Fi tendency. They tend to store personal feelings and are able to relive them. As such, you will see STJs do this (with their low Fi), but not necessarily NTPs. Ergo, what you might see with NTPs is a recalling of specific past details to inform their reasoning, but theyโll be less prone to reliving past hurt and wonโt be prone to expressing any past hurt openly. Low Fe users tend to relatively easily forget past emotion, although there can obviously be exceptions due to trauma and any significant enough emotional event.
P.S. Probably and not sure. It depends on which character we have the strongest case for, which will partially depend on where weโll be at in the show.
That really helped clear up A LOT for me!
Thank you so much!
Amazing article! I shared it in my MBTI and Socionics groups in Facebook! Keep more like this coming!!!